Legal Opinion
In Re Marshall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 17, 2008No. COA07-629Published
1Opinion of the Court
662 S.E.2d 5 (2008)
In the Matter of Raymond M. MARSHALL.
No. COA07-629.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
June 17, 2008.
Rudolf Widenhouse & Fialko, by M. Gordon Widenhouse Jr., Chapel Hill, for Respondent-Appellant.
Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Charles E. Reece, for the State.
STEPHENS, Judge.
On 19 October 2006, Judge Helms convened a hearing at which Raymond M. Marshall ("Respondent") was to show cause why he should not be held in criminal contempt for his conduct during a criminal trial over which Judge Helms presided. At the contempt hearing, Judge Helms found…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. AsheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Fukumoto v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.