Legal Opinion
Crotty v. City of Deadwood
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1989No. 16178, 16186PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKEEVER, Circuit Judge.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES
Charles and Angela Crotty (Crottys) initiated actions for injunctive and declaratory relief against the City of Deadwood (City) and Joe Mack (Mack) seeking to halt Mack’s construction of a motel addition on property nearly adjacent to Crottys’ resi dence and to declare the construction a nuisance in violation of City’s Ordinance 569, which purportedly zoned the area medium density residential. A temporary restraining order was issued and Crottys’ action followed. Mack’s cross-claim against City was settled prior to trial and judgment was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clem v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- W. H. Barber Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- In Re the Proceedings for Deposit in the Court of Monies and/or Trust Assets of the Equivalent Value of Approximately $45,877.68South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Raymond v. BaehrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- City of Alamogordo v. McGeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Renny v. Port Huron HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Sabow v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Sabow v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993