Legal Opinion

Sargent v. Coolidge

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 12, 1981PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice.

This is the second appeal in a tortuous course of litigation triggered by a mutual mistake of fact concerning where on the face of the earth lay the southern boundary of certain shorefront property in Trenton. The parties aggrieved in the first appeal were the plaintiffs, Casper and Teresa Sargent; those aggrieved presently are the defendants, Phillip and Edward Coolidge. Once again, for reasons that are explained below, we set aside the judgment before us and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

In 1968, Margaret Coolidge, the mother of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sargent v. CoolidgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Farley v. BryantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851
  3. Day v. McEwenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. McMullen v. DowleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. Hartman v. TillettOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fisco v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. GileSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Olson v. AlbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  4. Jordan v. SheaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  5. In Re PribishUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API