Legal Opinion
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 30, 1982No. Nos. 82-1418 to 82-1420, 82-1589, 82-1743 and 82-1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion filed PER CURIAM.
Concurring Statement filed by Circuit Judge WILKEY.
2Per curiam
The issues presented here on motion constitute an attempt by two losers of a race to the courthouse to invalidate the results of the race on the grounds that they didn’t know the race was on and that the winner wasn’t entitled to enter the race. The respective employer intervenors in these two cases, Colgate-Palmolive Company (“Col*317gate”) and Borden Chemical, a Division of Borden, Inc. (“Borden Chemical”), seek to destroy the venue advantage gained by the petitioning union’s1 prior filing of its petitions in this Court…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- National Labor Relations Board v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 283 v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Brockway Motor Trucks, Division of Mack Trucks, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.