Legal Opinion

In Re Hoy's Claim

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 4, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 8466PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

93 F.Supp. 265 (1950)

In re HOY'S CLAIM.

THURSTON

v.

HUTCHINSON.

Civ. A. No. 8466.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

October 3, 1950.

Supplemental Opinion October 4, 1950.

James M. Hoy, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

W. W. Jump, Boston, Mass., for defendant.

WYZANSKI, District Judge.

Hutchinson, a citizen of Massachusetts, injured Thurston, a citizen of Maine. The latter while in Massachusetts engaged Hoy as his attorney. Hoy on Thurston's behalf entered on June 28, 1949 a complaint in this Court against Hutchinson. On the same day in consideration of $10,400 Thurston released Hutchinson from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. International Union of United Automobile v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Phelps Steel, Inc. v. Von DeakMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  2. In Re AlbertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  3. In Re Leading Edge Products, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
  4. Andrews v. Central Surety InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
  5. Malman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API