Legal Opinion

Phelps Steel, Inc. v. Von Deak

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 6, 1987PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

What we have here is the assertion of an attorney’s lien under G. L. c. 221, § 50, following rupture of the attorney-client relationship. We affirm a judgment awarding a lien of $108,000 in favor of Cain, Hibbard, Myers & Cook (hereafter “CHMC”), a professional corporation. 2

CHMC had acted as counsel for Phelps Steel, Inc. (Phelps), a fabricator and erector of structural steel, in a construction contract dispute with Pyramid Company of Holyoke (Pyramid) (see note 1). That case had gone well for Phelps, resulting in a judgment in its favor of $286,651. Between the time of a master’s report,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Hudson River Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Covich v. ChambersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. Wormstead v. Town Manager of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Ambrose v. the Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Mulhern v. RoachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. International Materials Corp. v. Sun Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Reed Yates Farms, Inc. v. YatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. LoCicero v. Hartford Insurance GroupMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Craft v. KaneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Smith v. ConsalvoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API