Phelps Steel, Inc. v. Von Deak
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
What we have here is the assertion of an attorney’s lien under G. L. c. 221, § 50, following rupture of the attorney-client relationship. We affirm a judgment awarding a lien of $108,000 in favor of Cain, Hibbard, Myers & Cook (hereafter “CHMC”), a professional corporation. 2
CHMC had acted as counsel for Phelps Steel, Inc. (Phelps), a fabricator and erector of structural steel, in a construction contract dispute with Pyramid Company of Holyoke (Pyramid) (see note 1). That case had gone well for Phelps, resulting in a judgment in its favor of $286,651. Between the time of a master’s report,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dunn v. Hudson River Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Covich v. ChambersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Wormstead v. Town Manager of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Ambrose v. the Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Mulhern v. RoachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- International Materials Corp. v. Sun Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Reed Yates Farms, Inc. v. YatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- LoCicero v. Hartford Insurance GroupMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Craft v. KaneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Smith v. ConsalvoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.