Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Payne

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Walworth County. Hon. Eyman T. Boucher, Judge. Action by E. C. Hughes against W. H. Payne. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.

In this case plaintiff claimed that on the 5th day of April, 1906, he agreed to purchase and the defendant agreed to sell to him the S. E. % of section 30, township 124, range 79, in *215Walworth county, at the agreed price of $12 per acre; that $300 of the purchase price was paid down in cash, and it was further agreed that the balance of the purchase price was to- be paid in about a week, when the deed to the land was to be delivered to plaintiff. The only writing that took place between these parties in such transaction was the following instrument: “Java, S- D., April s, 1906. Received of E.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grieve v. GrieveWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Andrus v. BlazzardUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Clark v. HartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Roundy v. KentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Stodalka v. NovotnyIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Teutsch v. HvistendahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Graves v. GreenfielSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API