Legal Opinion
Hall v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 2, 1940No. Nos. 3143, 3144PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.
The exception of the plaintiff mentioned last above presents no question of law for this court since the matter is one solely within the sound discretion of the court below and there is nothing to indicate any abuse or error of discretion in the ruling made. Deming v. Foster, 42 N. H. 165, 178, 179; Sanborn v. Railroad, 76 N. H. 65, 66, and cases cited, Flannagan v. Shevenell, 82 N. H. 403.
The defendants’ exception to the granting of the plaintiff’s motion for limitation of issues at the second trial of the actions against the Atlas and New York Underwriters companies also presents no legal…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bennett v. SusserMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
3Cited by14 opinions
- Judith Brochu and Emmanuel T. Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Jay Edwards, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Town of Hooksett School District v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1984
- Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Proctor v. Bank of New Hampshire, N.A.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.