Legal Opinion

Truck Insurance Exchange v. Bill Olinger Mercury, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1972PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding in which plaintiff, an insurance company, seeks to estab lisli that it has no responsibility under a policy of automobile theft insurance it issued to the defendant, Bill Olinger Mercury, Inc., (Olinger). The case was tried to the court. Olinger appealed from a judgment that plaintiff owed it no duty under the insurance contract. The other parties to this ease are not concerned with this appeal.

Plaintiff’s policy insured Olinger, an automobile dealer, against loss occasioned by theft of its automobiles. However, it excluded losses which arose from “*…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. May v. Chicago Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Falk v. SUL AMERICA TERRESTRES MARITIMOS, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. UglandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Mock v. Missouri Union Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Waller v. Rocky Mountain Fire and Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ho Bros. Restaurant v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. C & B LIVESTOCK, INC. v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. ShaskyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. INTERNATIONAL HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API