Murray v. Bank of America
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
Two appeals, which have been consolidated pursuant to stipulation, are before this court. In one case (Civ. No. 26412) the principal question presented is whether proper provision was made in the decree of final distribution in the estate of Henrietta Doescher, deceased, with respect to the amount of money which the appellant Minnie Jacoby Murray was entitled to receive under the will. 1 The second appeal (Civ. No. 26604) is from an order denying the appellant’s motion to vacate or amend the decree of distribution pursuant to the provisions of section 473 of the Code of *106Civil Procedure; that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Estate of O'DeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Eckstrom v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of DoescherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963