Citizens' Bank of Paso Robles v. Rucker
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff and from an order denying the defendant’s motion for new trial. The questions involved are presented by the appeal from the judgment, which alone, therefore, need be considered. Omitting immaterial circumstances, the case as presented by the complaint (which is found to be true in all its allegations) is as follows:—
The defendant B. F. Rucker on or about September’!, 1896, borrowed from the plaintiff the sum of $9,439.85, for the purpose of purchasing a band of cattle—falsely representing to it that the same could be immediately…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Herrlich v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Miller v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Stateler v. Superior Court of Alameda Cty.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Carit v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Credit Bureau, Inc. v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- West v. StainbackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Stoner v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. ArmstrongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Schwartz v. StoneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.