Legal Opinion

Singer Pipe & Supply Co. v. Houston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 18, 1933No. 23905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

On February 3, 1932, the State Industrial Commission entered its order wherein it was found that the respondent herein, Ted Houston, sustained an accidental injury within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the stare, while in the employ of Singer Pipe & Supply Company, one of the petitioners in this cause. Under the terms of the order the respondent was awarded as compensation the sum of $8.08 per week for not exceeding a period of 300 weeks.

The order contained a finding that claimant had sustained a permanent partial disability as defined by section 13356, O. S. 1931.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cameron Coal Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Canadian Mining & Development Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Brooks & Dahlgren, Inc. v. DollarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Ness Const. Co. v. WaltcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Reams v. MalcolmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API