Legal Opinion

Taxicab Motor Co. v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1913No. 10986PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered October 29, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, upon a policy of indemnity insurance.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, Taxicab Motor Company, owns and operates a number of taxicabs within the city of Spokane in which it carries passengers for hire. The appellant is an insurance company, making it a business to insure against losses from casualties resulting from the conduct of the various industries. On February 26, 1910, the appellant, for a premium of $625, issued to the respondent an insurance policy, insuring it for a period of one year “against loss or expense resulting from claims upon the assured for damages on account of bodily injuries, or death, accidently suffered while this policy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burger v. Taxicab Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Kennedy v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Bausman v. Credit Guarantee Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Wilson v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  5. Pasewalk v. BollmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. John Griffiths & Son Co. v. National Fireproofing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. In Re: Prudential Lines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. Conroy v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API