Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Morris USA

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 13, 2022No. Civil Action No. 1999-2496Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 99-2496 (PLF) ) PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) OPINION On October 29, 2021, defendant tobacco manufacturers (“manufacturers”) and the national retailer groups (“retailers”) filed two motions in limine to exclude certain testimony proffered by plaintiffs’ expert witnesses. 1 The first motion alleges that two of plaintiffs’ experts – Dr. Frank Chaloupka and Dr. James Spaeth –…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Eduardo Burkhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  5. Sharon Bonds v. District of Columbia and Director, District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API