Filippini v. Stead
The Superior Court of New York City
Appeal from judgment entered on verdict directed in favor of the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtAd am, J.
The action was to charge defendant with liability for a judgment of $9,332, obtained by default against the firm of Allen & Stead, composed of Harry Allen and the defendant, the latter not having been served with the summons in the original action. (Code, §§ 1937 et seg.) It appears that prior to ¡November 7, 1885, the firm of Allen & Stead purchased for and on account of the plaintiff, seven first mortgage seven per cent bonds of the Utah Southern Extension Railroad Company, of the par value of $1,000 each, and the bonds were paid for by the plaintiff.
The bonds were thereafter deposited with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Colgrove v. . TallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Dounce v. . DowNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Grow v. . GarlockNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Boyd v. ColtNew York Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kaydee Sales Corp. v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Young v. Town of MacombAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Bank of United States v. MoskowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
- Drake v. HodgsonNew York Supreme Court · 1922
- Young v. Town of MacombAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.