Legal Opinion
Hatzenbuehler v. Call
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided February 8, 1995No. 04-93-00787-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARDBERGER, Justice.
This is a usury case. Call brought suit for repayment of a loan. Hatzenbuehler responded by filing a counterclaim asserting usury. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of Call for $5,200, the amount of the loan. The court denied Hatzenbuehler’s counterclaim for usury from which he now appeals. We affirm the judgment.
Mike Hatzenbuehler and Elsa Call had been friends for twenty years. Hatzenbueh-ler asked Call for a loan and she agreed. The initial loan was for $3,700. Hatzenbueh-ler agreed, in writing, to repay Call the principal amount with interest by January…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smart v. Tower Land & Investment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Westwind Exploration, Inc. v. Homestate Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Steves Sash & Door Co. v. Ceco Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- Texas Commerce Bank-Arlington v. GoldringTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Tygrett v. University Gardens Homeowners' Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Domizio v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Pentico v. Mad-Wayler, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Jeff Domizio, Frank Valenzuela and Maria Valenzuela v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Jim Schmidt Individually and D/B/A the Goat Company and the Wildlife Ranch v. Dr. Charles W. Graham DVM and Tyler Graham D/B/A Hamilton Commission Company, Kristen McFarlin, and Hamilton Commission Company, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023