Pentico v. Mad-Wayler, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.
This is a usury case. The trial court granted the motion for summary judgment of appellees, Mad-Wayler, Inc. and David C. Madsen, Individually, and ordered that appellants, Maurice Pentico and Pauline Penti-co, forfeit the principal sum of $96,590 and pay a penalty of $35,931.26. By two points of error, appellants contend the trial court erred by denying their motion for summary judgment and by granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment. We reverse the trial…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Frost National Bank v. Burge, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Domizio v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Kaplan v. Tiffany Development Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Bair Chase Property Co. v. S & K Development Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Varel Manufacturing Co. v. Acetylene Oxygen Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.