Legal Opinion

Texas Commerce Bank-Arlington v. Goldring

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1984No. C-2248PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the lender in an allegedly usurious transaction. The trial court granted summary judgment for the lender which was reversed by the court of appeals. 651 S.W.2d 361. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

P.A. Goldring and wife, Joyce (Goldring) had been customers of Texas Commerce Bank-Arlington (the Bank) since 1939. Three times between 1965 and 1970 they borrowed money from the Bank and signed promissory notes secured by liens on a parcel of real estate. None of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston Sash and Door Co., Inc. v. HeanerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stedman v. Georgetown Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Greever v. PerskyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Ross v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Goldring v. Texas Commerce Bank-ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lovick v. Ritemoney Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Oyster Creek Financial Corp. v. Richwood Investments II, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  4. First Bank v. Tony's Tortilla Factory, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Swank v. Sverdlin, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API