McNamara v. Malloy
District Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEDDY, Chief Judge.
I. Statement of Facts
Plaintiffs, Alice McNamara and Francis Gabel, were involved in separate automobile accidents. Neither was covered by a liability insurance policy at the time of the accident. The defendant, Vermont’s Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 1 required proof of financial responsibility from both plaintiffs, ordering each of them to purchase motor vehicle liability insurance as required by 23 V.S.A. § 801(a) (Supp.1971) 2 Both plaintiffs allege indigency and contend that they are unable to afford liability insurance. The plaintiffs were not given…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Clarence Eisen v. Oliver C. EastmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. Nordic Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Wright v. MalloyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1974
- Gargagliano v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Miller v. MalloyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1972
- Wells v. MalloyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.