Legal Opinion
Goldsmith v. Erwin
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 26, 1950No. 6106PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYCHE, District Judge.
This action was instituted by J. Z. Erwin, trading as Erwin-Sutton Hosiery Mills, against Sheertex Hosiery, Inc., and A. Phillip Goldsmith for $25,850.79, for goods alleged to have been sold to A. Phillip Goldsmith and shipped and delivered to Sheertex Hosiery, Inc. Plaintiff was unable to obtain valid service upon the corporate defendant, and for this reason the action was dismissed as to Sheertex Hosiery, Inc. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $25,850.79. The appeal from the judgment raises two questions: (1) Was there sufficient evidence to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peele v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Whitehurst v. . PadgettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Peele v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Dozier v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Simmons v. . GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dewitt Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Company and W. Ray FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Nephi Processing Plant, Inc., a Corporation v. Western Cooperative Hatcheries, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Brad Ragan, Inc. v. Callicutt Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Dealers Specialties, Inc. v. Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Ebb Corp. v. GliddenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.