Legal Opinion

King v. Warren

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

We granted the rule eleven application of defendant Billy James Warren to review the finding of the Court of Appeals that plaintiffs had established an oral trust in real estate by clear, cogent and convincing evidence.

Plaintiffs are the children of Paul King, deceased, and his second wife, Audrey Faye King. Millie King Hurley Warren was the daughter of Paul King and half-sister of plaintiffs. Defendant Billy King Warren was Millie’s second husband, and he acquired the real estate involved in this suit as sole beneficiary of her will, upon her death in April, 1977.

In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Sanderson v. MilliganTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tansil v. TansilTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  2. Saddler v. SaddlerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. In Re Estate of RoarkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  4. Gray v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  5. Roark v. BischoffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API