Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1 In this appeal, we determine whether exclusions in automobile insurance policies that deny underinsured motorist benefits to the insured person because the underinsured motor vehicle is operated by a Commonwealth agency violate the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law [hereinafter MVFRL], 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701-1799.7, or are contrary to public policy. We conclude that such government vehicle exclusions impermissibly conflict -with the provisions of the MVFRL and violate public policy. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment that the insureds are legally entitled to recover…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, H/w Patsy Dezii William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, Patsy DeziiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- In Re: B. Fiedler, Appeal of: E. FiedlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- C.B. v. J.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Neuhard v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.