Commonwealth v. Ford
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
A jury convicted the defendant of assault and battery on a correctional officer (G. L. c. 127, § 38B). On appeal the defendant argues (1) that his motion for a required finding of not guilty should have been granted; (2) that the judge’s instructions wrongfully removed from the jury’s consideration certain essential elements of the crime; (3) that the prosecutor committed improprieties in his closing argument; and (4) that certain rulings of the judge allowed prejudicial evidence to be admitted. We vacate the conviction and remand the case for resentencing of the defendant on the lesser…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClaryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. McDuffeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. DiazMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. KnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- In Re Civil Investigative Demand Addressed to Yankee Milk, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. JonasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Commonwealth v. SollivanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. GearyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991