Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sollivan

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 12, 1996No. Nos. 95-P-1286 & 95-P-1295PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

These cases, which were consolidated for appellate review, present the same issue — whether the judge committed error in denying the defendants’ motions for required findings of not guilty on complaints charging larceny in a building.

The facts in neither case are in dispute. The defendant Sollivan was arrested by Sears Department Store employees in *285Holyoke after he left the store with a portable stereo radio without paying for it. The defendant Drayton was arrested by Filene’s Department Store employees in Holyoke after she took clothing without paying for the items.

Both defendants were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KiernanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Condon v. HaitsmaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Commonwealth v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Robinson v. Van AukenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChristianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. WellardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. RandallMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API