United States v. Jonas
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Mike K. Jonas argues that, for the purpose of determining the applicability of the definition of “crime of violence” contained in the career offender guideline, USSG § 4B1.2(a), any use of his Massachusetts conviction for assault and battery on a correctional officer (ABCO), Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 265, § 13D, is foreclosed by the rationale of our prior decision in United States v. Holloway, 630 F.3d 252 (1st Cir.2011). The government demurs, arguing that we should apply the rationale of our post-Holloway decision in United States v. Dancy, 640 F.3d 455…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Melissa Alleruzzo v. SuperValu, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Serrano-MercadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. RamirezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.