Legal Opinion

Farrell v. District Court

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 20, 1957No. 18301PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

Petitioner has applied to this court for a writ in the nature of habeas corpus, claiming that he is unlawfully deprived of his liberty.

He appears in propria persona, but has filed no brief in support of his application. We have not required the Attorney General to answer the same since on the face of the petition and the record before us no proper grounds were given, and none exist, for issuance of the writ requested.

Viewed in their most favorable light, the grounds set forth by petitioner could be considered by this court only upon writ of error. Judgment and sentence were entered against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Rivera v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  3. People ex rel. Metzger v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. Best v. People ex rel. FloromSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stilley v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. McGrath v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  3. Lewis v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API