Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Tinsley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 11, 1957No. 17923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

Plaintiff in error was the petitioner below. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Petitioner filed a petition for a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus pursuant to Rule 106 (a) (1), R.C.P. Colo., in the District Court of Pueblo County. After full hearing and the taking of evidence, the petition was denied and petitioner remanded to custody. Complaining of the judgment below, petitioner is here on writ of 'error.

Petitioner is before this court for the second time. On August 3, 1953, in the case of Freeman, et al. v. People, 128 Colo. 99, 260 P. (2d) 603, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Bute v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Hart v. BestSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. People v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Kelley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Trueblood v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Stilley v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. Specht v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Lowe v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Valentine v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API