Legal Opinion
Schreier v. Siegel
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 7, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
Action to restrain unfair competition brought pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Trade Law of the State of New York (Gen. Business Law, § 369-b), at times referred to as the FeldCrawford Act. Plaintiffs seek an injunction pendente lite restraining the continuance of the practices and violations complained of. Section 369-a permits price fixing of certain commodities.
It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiffs operate licensed pharmacies where they sell at retail, and that defendant is engaged in a like vocation and that the parties litigant are in free and open competition with each…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Florida v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cummings v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Miller v. Kaliwerke Aschersleben Aktien-GesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Martínez BazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
- Helena Rubinstein, Inc. v. Charline's Cut Rate, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Bloch v. BartmanPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1946
- People v. Martínez BazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
- Sony Corp. of America v. Value House, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972