Legal Opinion

Helena Rubinstein, Inc. v. Charline's Cut Rate, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 13, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

Complainant’s business is the marketing of cosmetics and beauty preparations under its own trade-marks and brands. The bill pleaded the resale by defendant, continuously from November, 1941, to May, 1942, in the conduct of its business in the City of Summit, of certain of complainant’s products below minimum resale prices fixed by contract with retailers pursuant to R. S. 56:4—3, e t seq., popularly known as the “Pair Trade Act,” and charged that thereby defendants were guilty of unfair competition to the detriment of complainant’s good will.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schreier v. SiegelNew York Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Downs v. Benatar's Cut Rate Drug StoresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API