Legal Opinion
Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEber, J.
In this action it was stipulated that findings of fact and conclusions of law be waived.
This is an auxiliary suit instituted by plaintiff Brown, as an attachment plaintiff and creditor, and the plaintiff Finn, as sheriff in aid of an attachment as authorized by sections 922 and 943 of the Civil Practice Act. The relevant portion of section 922 provides:
“ 1. In the event that the person owing any debt to the defendant, or holding property, effects or things in action of the defendant or interest therein subject to attachment, on which a levy under a warrant has been made, as in this act…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Beaver v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Vladikavkazsky Railway Co. v. New York Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Murphy v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Sayer v. WynkoopNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of LofmarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McGlynn v. SchultzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Kiyoichi Fujikawa v. Sunrise Soda Water Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Dezsofi v. JacobyNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.