Legal Opinion

H. F. Watson Co. v. Christ

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1916No. Appeal, No. 173PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 173, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Schuylkill Co., March T., 1915, No. 201, dissolving attachment execution in ease of H. F. Watson Co., Inc., v. George M. Christ. Rule to dissolve attachment execution. Before Brumm, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order dissolving the attachment. — It was error to dissolve the attachment: Smith v. Brooke, 49 Pa. 147; Darlington v. Watson, 49 Pa.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 173, Oct. T., 1915, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Schuylkill Co., March T., 1915, No. 201, dissolving attachment execution in ease of H. F. Watson Co., Inc., v. George M. Christ. Rule to dissolve attachment execution. Before Brumm, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order dissolving the attachment. — It was error to dissolve the attachment: Smith v. Brooke, 49 Pa. 147; Darlington v. Watson, 49 Pa. Superior Ct. 611; Heebner v. Chave, 5 Pa. 115; Hamberger v. Marcus, 157 Pa. 133; Hartman v. Mitzel, 8 Pa. Superior Ct. 22; O’Neill v.…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

The defendant was employed by the East Bear Ridge Coal Company, the garnishee, in and about the erection of a coal breaker by the latter. In the regular course of his employment he assisted in planning the structure, and in conjunction with the president of the company, made modifications in the plans as the work progressed. In addition, he laid out the work (in which he did some manual labor, as, for example, measuring and marking the timber for guidance in. framing) and directed and supervised the execution of it by the other workmen, he rendering such assistance from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamberger v. MarcusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Smith v. BrookeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bell v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Danziger v. FerberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. McCloskey v. Northdale Woolen MillsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Dunn v. Printing Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Right Lumber Co. v. KretchmarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API