Legal Opinion
Right Lumber Co. v. Kretchmar
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 19, 1963No. Appeal, No. 279PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Flood, J.,
The Eight Lumber Co., Inc., the appellant, having obtained judgment against Henry Eretchmar, the defendant, issued an attachment execution, serving Flower Construction Company, Inc. and Bayard Corporation as garnishees. To the interrogatories filed by the plaintiff, the garnishees’ answers admitted that they were indebted to Eretchmar in the sum of $47,-632.50, the amount of a judgment obtained by him against them but averred by way of new matter that this judgment was for wages and salary and exempt or immune from attachment. The garnishees attached to their answers a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weidemoyer v. SwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Smith v. BrookeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- Tax Review Board v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Wells Whip Co. v. Tanners Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- H. F. Watson Co. v. ChristSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joel S. Abel v. American Art Analog, Inc. And Michael D. Zellman and Philip Cohen. Appeal of American Art Analog, Inc. And Philip CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Miller v. Commercial Electric Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Guty v. United States Steel Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County1972