Legal Opinion
Bush Terminal Co. v. Peninsular & Oriental Steam Nav. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 28, 1921PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtL. Hand, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
No excuse is made or is possible for the navigation of the Dalzell. Not only was her lookout wholly inattentive, but her pilot must have been equally negligent, for although he could not seo off on his starboard hand, it is inconceivable that he should have been paying any attention whatever, or he would have heard the continuously repeated signals from the Benalla. The ease, therefore, presents the strongest possible ground for-the application of the well-known rule in The Chicago (C. C. A.) 125 F. 712, The Transfer No. 8 (C. C. A.) 96 F. 253, and The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Yang-Tsze Ins. v. Furness, Withy & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- The ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- The Transfer No. 8Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
3Cited by8 opinions
- The El SolDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
- SKIBS A/S SILJESTAD v. S/S Mathew LuckenbachDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- The BernCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Universal Ins. v. The Coast BankerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Alcoa S. S. Co. v. PublicoverDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.