Keppler v. City of Richmond
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of city of Richmond. Decree for defendant. Complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Sims, J.,
after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court.
The argument in this case has covered many subjects: and the law bearing upon the essential requisites in such a case as this, both of a dedication on the part of the land owner and ian acceptance on the part of the public, jvhether actual, or implied in fact or in law, or dispensed with by law, has been ably discussed by learned counsel on both sides of the cause and numerous authorities have been cited. But after all we find but little difference between counsel as to the legal principles involved.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Morgan v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Speir v. . Town of New UtrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Mayor of Macon v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Buntin v. City of DanvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Staunton v. Augusta Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Morlang v. City of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- City of Hampton v. StieffenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Richmond-Ashland Railway Co. v. Commonwealth ex rel. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Fugate v. NettletonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.