Legal Opinion
Richmond-Ashland Railway Co. v. Commonwealth ex rel. City of Richmond
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided April 11, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.
The city of Richmond, on July 7, 1932, adopted the following ordinance:
“That it shall be the duty of the Richmond-Ashland Railway Company to relocate its track where the same crosses Lombardy street, in accordance with a general plan on file in the office of the director of public works of the city of Richmond, marked drawing No. 0-3568, an Ozlin copy of which is hereto attached and made a part of this ordinance. Said track so re-located shall be at grade shown upon said drawing and shall, where the same crosses Lombardy street, be of groove rail construction. Said railway company shall…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cummings v. FulghumSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- National Linen Service Corp. v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Clark v. Town of MiddleburgLoudoun County Circuit Court · 1990
- MacDonald v. City of FairfaxFairfax County Circuit Court · 2010