Legal Opinion

Matthews v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 9, 2010No. Civil Action 09-2206(JDB)PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Bernard Matthews, William Christopher Malloy, Kevin T. Anderson, Brian Covington, and Derrick Craig each allege that officers of the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) unlawfully strip searched them. They therefore have brought this action against the District of Columbia and several named and unnamed officers of the MPD, alleging violations of the U.S. Constitution and District of Columbia common law. Before the Court are the District of Columbia’s motion to dismiss and the individual officers’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons detailed…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Thomas v. City of Galveston, TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
  2. Long v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Harvey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Ingram v. Shipman-MeyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Westfahl v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API