Legal Opinion

Grabow v. Bergeth

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1930PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Biedzell, L.

This is an action to recover damages for deceit alleged to have been practiced, in pursuit of a conspiracy between the two defendants, in the sale of bank stock in the Aurelia State Bank at Aurelia, North Dakota. In the trial court the plaintiff had judgment. The defendants moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The motion being denied, the defendants appeal from the judgment and from the order denying the motion.

Prior to the 29th of March, 1926, the defendant Bergeth was the owner of thirty-seven shares of the stock of the bank and was its president…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ShuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Haight v. . HaytNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Stewart v. BalderstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Wikstrom v. Yolo Fliers ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. John V. Farwell Co. v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Coldwell Banker-First Realty v. MEIDE & SON, INCORPORATEDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Brenna v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Matter of Estate of KnudsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Berger v. SellersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API