Doe v. S.B.M.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Judge:
John Doe (Doe) filed this action alleging two theories: (1) Publication of Private Facts (the tort of the Right to Privacy) and (2) Outrage (the tort of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) against S.B.M. seeking a permanent injunction and damages. After S.B.M. defaulted, a damages hearing was held and Doe was awarded a total of $30,204.23 damages. We affirm.
FACTSIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In the spring of 1994, Doe and S.B.M. were involved in a homosexual relationship and lived together for approximately three weeks in Greenville, South Carolina. Doe ended this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Washington v. WhitakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Parks v. Morris Homes Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Howard v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Long v. NORRIS & ASSOCIATES, LTD.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Clark v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Holroyd v. RequaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Limehouse v. HulseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Limehouse v. HulseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.