Legal Opinion

Limehouse v. Hulsey

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 16, 2011No. 4805PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*58THOMAS, J.

This is an appeal from an entry of default and the subsequent default damages trial based on a slander action against Paul Hulsey and the Hulsey Litigation Group, LLC (collectively Hulsey). Damages (actual and punitive) were found in excess of $7.3 million. Hulsey now appeals, alleging the trial court erred in (1) granting entry of default without subject matter jurisdiction, (2) failing to grant a motion to set aside the entry of default, (3) allegedly depriving Hulsey of due process in the default damages trial, and (4) allowing an award of $5 million in punitive damages. We…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Philip Morris USA v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Limehouse v. HulseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  2. Limehouse v. HulseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API