Van Tuyl v. Schwab
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, George 0. Van Tuyl, Jr., as Superintendent of Banks, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York, granting respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
This action is an omnibus one brought by the Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York against the stockholders of the insolvent Carnegie Trust Company to enforce their liability under section 196 of the Banking Law as it stood on January 7, 1911. (See Consol. Laws, chap. 2 [Laws of 1909, chap. 10], § 196.) The question involved arises under a supplemental answer of the defendant, respondent, Charles Arthur Moore, Jr., to which the plaintiff has served a reply which contains no effective denial of any material fact alleged in the supplemental answer.
The facts thus pleaded and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Corning & Horner v. McCulloughNew York Court of Appeals · 1847
- Platt v. WilmotSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Wheeler v. . MillarNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Cochran v. . WiechersNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3Cited by11 opinions
- Broderick v. AdamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Broderick v. AaronNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- White v. IdsardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Richards v. CharlesNew York Supreme Court · 1917
- Broderick v. AdamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.