Legal Opinion

Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 21, 2009No. 06-305TPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The plaintiff, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con Ed), and its subsidiaries, brought this claim to recover funds allegedly overpaid to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the 1997 tax year, *232when the IRS disallowed certain rental, interest and transaction cost deductions taken by the plaintiff, associated with a leveraged lease transaction the plaintiff entered into in 1997. This complex, leveraged lease transaction, referred to in a number of ways by the parties, including “leveraged lease,” “lease-leaseback,” or “lease-in, lease-out,”…

2Cases cited113 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  2. Howard Regional Health System v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Wells Fargo & Co. And Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. Altria Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. Wells Fargo & Co. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API