Legal Opinion

Stanley v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 19, 1983No. CR 83-60PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richard B. Adkisson, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Jack Stanley, pled guilty to fourteen crimes of burglary and fourteen crimes of theft. After sentence and commitment to the Department of Correction, appellant filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea under A.R.Cr.P. Rule 26.1. Appellant alleged that his plea was made involuntarily because the prosecuting attorney threatened to put his wife, a co-defendant, on trial first and appellant feared that she might receive a substantial sentence. On appeal this motion is being considered pursuant to A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37 since it was filed after sentencing.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shipman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Rawls v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  5. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HerredSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Broomfield v. Columbia County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2023
  3. State v. HerredSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API