Legal Opinion

Matter of Houston

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 7, 1994No. 24024PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This attorney grievance matter arises from the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, where the initial Hearing Panel’s recommendation was to impose an indefinite suspension, and the Executive Committee’s recommendation was to order disbarment. We agree with the Executive Committee’s findings of misconduct and the recommendation that Houston be disbarred.

FACTS

The findings of the Hearing Panel, which were adopted by the Executive Committee, outline a long pattern of various ethical violations. While the Hearing Panel recommended an indefinite suspension, the Executive Committee…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. In the Matter of FousheeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Matter of LeppardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  4. In the Matter of SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  5. In re HoustonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  2. ATTORNEY U v. the Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In re HoustonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. In the Matter of Charles E. HoustonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API