Legal Opinion

ATTORNEY U v. the Mississippi Bar

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1996No. 92-BA-01201-SCTPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

678 So.2d 963 (1996)

ATTORNEY U

v.

THE MISSISSIPPI BAR.

No. 92-BA-01201-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 20, 1996.

James A. Becker, Jr., Leah D. McDowell, C. Maison Heidelberg, Watkins & Eager, Jackson, Myles A. Parker, Jackson, for Appellant.

Michael B. Martz, Jackson, Charles J. Mikhail, Pascagoula, for Appellee.

En Banc.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr., Justice, for the Court:[1]

INTRODUCTION

The petitions for rehearing are granted. Original opinions are withdrawn and these opinions are substituted therefor. This case is reversed and rendered, as it is now determined that all…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Richard A. Thalheim, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. In Re HimmelIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Myers v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Mississippi State Bar v. YoungMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Mississippi State Bar v. BlackmonMississippi Supreme Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mississippi Bar v. FeltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re RiehlmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. Patton Medical of Gulf Coast, Inc. v. Michael RelleCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
  4. The Mississippi Bar v. Merry Caitlin JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API