Legal Opinion

Tschantz v. Ferguson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1991No. 89-1842PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

Appellant, Thomas E. Ferguson, contends that R.C. 2743.02 (F) mandated dismissal of the action in the court of common pleas due to a failure of jurisdiction.

Appellee, Elizabeth Tschantz, responds threefold. First, due to the decision of the Court of Claims, this case is moot; second, R.C. 2743.02(F) cannot be retroactively applied to a suit filed before its enactment; and third, *133the stay of proceedings in the court of common pleas complies with R.C. 2743.02(F).

We agree with appellee’s first proposition. This case was rendered moot by the decision in the Court of Claims denying immunity and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Newton v. Court of ClaimsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. M.R. v. NiesenOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Althof v. Ohio State Bd. of Psycho., Unpublished Decision (3-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Elliott v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API