Clermont v. Secured Investment Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CLARK, J.
Plaintiffs James and Katherine Clermont, in their capacities both as individuals and as representatives of a class, appeal from an order of dismissal following the sustaining, without leave to amend, of demurrers to all eight counts of their complaint.
Facts
Plaintiffs’ action was based on the theory that defendants Les-Rob, Incorporated (Les-Rob) and Secured Investment Corporation (SIC) had conspired to exact and had in fact exacted usurious interest from plaintiffs Clermont and other members of their class (comprised of persons who during the four years preceding the filing of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Weaver v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Chance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Begelfer v. NajarianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Garrett v. Coast & Southern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- United Cable Television of Baltimore Ltd. Partnership v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Beasley v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Mattvidi Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Nationsbank of Virginia, N.A.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.