Legal Opinion
Hricik v. Stryker Biotech, LLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 30, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-3228PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael R. Hricik brings claims against Stryker Biotech, LLC, Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, and Stryker Corporation (collectively, “Stryker”), and two individual Stryker sales representatives, Michael Cowgill and Kevin O’Dare, arising out of Defendants’ allegedly illegal promotion of an off-label1 use of *697OP-1 Implant and Calstrux, two medical devices manufactured and marketed by Stryker. Hricik underwent spinal fusion surgery in which his surgeon used OP-1 Implant and Calstrux in the off-label manner promoted by Defendants and sustained…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- In Re Schering Plough Corp. Intron/Temodar Consumer Class ActionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Stephen B. Batoff, ph.d. v. State Farm Insurance Company, Leonard M. Paul, ed.dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re: Karen A. Briscoe Alfred Lara Wanda T. Kizer Debra Alexander Rhonda Allen Mary Green Glenda D. Abbott and Leslie BalesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Medical Imaging, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A. (In re National Medical Imaging, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- AVICOLLI v. BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Pager v. Metropolitan EdisonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019