Legal Opinion
DeGrave v. National Automatic Merchandising Ass'n Pension Plan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 18, 2005No. 04 C 8147PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DARRAH, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Steven DeGrave, filed suit against Defendants, the National Automatic Merchandising Association Pension Plan (“the Plan”) and the National Automatic Merchandising Association (“NAMA”), alleging violation of Section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1140. Presently pending before the Court is the Plan’s Motion to Dismiss.
BACKGROUND
A reading of DeGrave’s Complaint supports the following summary of the alleged conduct of the parties.
DeGrave was hired by NAMA on April 3, 2000, as the Vice…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tony Walker v. Tommy G. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Jewel Marshall-Mosby v. Corporate Receivables, Inc., and John Does 1-10Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- John S. Graehling v. Village of Lombard, Illinois, and Steven WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DeGRAVE v. NATIONAL AUTO. MERCHANDISING ASS'NDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005