Legal Opinion

Purvis v. Public Utility District No. 1

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1957No. 33886PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This is an action to recover the reasonable value of a lawyer’s legal services rendered to a municipal corporation.

The minutes of May 28, 1948, of the board of commissioners of defendant public utility district No. 1 of Kitsap county disclose that

“A discussion was held with Ralph Purvis [plaintiff] in regard to retaining as attorney for the P.U.D. District 1. It was agreed by the Commissioners that Mr. Purvis be retained, and discussions of salary be postponed until a later date.”

Plaintiff acted as the attorney for the defendant until December 1, 1952. He attended meetings of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hailey v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Baker v. Lake City Sewer DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Stoddard v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Aall v. Riverside Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Purvis v. Bremer's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Central Heat, Inc. v. Daily Olympian, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Jolly v. FossumWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Evans v. YAKIMA ETC. ASS'N.Washington Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API