Legal Opinion

Hailey v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1944No. 29261PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the reasonable value of personal services rendered to King county upon the strength of alleged assurances made by individual members of the board of county commissioners that compensation would be made. The individual members of the board, together with the sureties on their official bonds, were joined with King county as parties defendant.

Trial was had after issues joined, which resulted in a judgment for three thousand dollars against King county and dismissal of the other defendants. King county appeals from the judgment against it; and plaintiff…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Green v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Jones v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Nissen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State ex rel. Bain v. Clallam County Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Christie v. the Port of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. King County v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API